RICHARD EDEN: If Harry has any decency he will hand back his controversial award and give it instead to someone who values self-sacrifice and service before personal gain

When the Duke of Sussex gave his first speech after quitting royal duties in 2020 to seek his fortune overseas, he voiced both his sadness and indignation that his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth, had not allowed him to keep his ties to the Armed Forces.

‘Our hope was to continue serving the Queen, the Commonwealth, and my military associations, but without public funding,’ he told guests at a charity event in West London. ‘Unfortunately, that wasn’t possible.’

Prince Harry will have been further wounded, say old friends, to see his brother, Prince William, handed the role of Colonel-in-Chief of the Army Air Corps by their father, King Charles, at a colourful ceremony at Middle Wallop, Hampshire, last month.

In his speech in 2020, Prince Harry voiced both his sadness and indignation that his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth, had not allowed him to keep his ties to the Armed Forces

In his speech in 2020, Prince Harry voiced both his sadness and indignation that his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth, had not allowed him to keep his ties to the Armed Forces

There is a poignancy to the location, as Middle Wallop is where Harry, 39, did his training before serving with the Army Air Corps as co-pilot in Apache attack helicopters in Afghanistan.

There was a time when the younger brother could legitimately have expected to be given the Army Air Corps role himself.

For, although William, 42, went on to pilot helicopters with the search and rescue service of the Royal Air Force, he has never been involved in active conflict.

Harry’s decision to quit royal life means that he is no longer eligible for such honorary roles, however.

‘Harry was genuinely hurt that he was not allowed to retain his formal links to the military,’ one British friend of the Prince tells me. ‘They meant the world to him.’

In the absence of new honours from the King, Harry has taken to accepting awards in the U.S., his adopted homeland. And the latest of these has proved contentious.

Next week, the duke is due to receive the Pat Tillman Award for Service at the Excellence in Sports Performance Yearly (ESPY) Awards – a ceremony in Los Angeles run by television network ESPN – for his work with the Invictus Games Foundation. It will be hosted by Meghan’s friend, the tennis star Serena Williams.

The award is named in memory of a late American football star, who gave up his sporting career to serve in the military after the devastating terror attacks on September 11, 2001.

Tillman was killed by friendly fire in Afghanistan three years later.

Harry founded the Invictus Games in 2014 to help wounded, injured or sick armed services personnel and veterans, and he has been widely praised for the initiative.

However, the announcement of his Pat Tillman award has provoked an outcry in the U.S., with more than 50,000 people signing a petition against it.

The critics include Tillman’s mother, Mary, who has said: ‘I am shocked as to why they would select such a controversial and divisive individual to receive the award. There are recipients far more fitting. There are individuals working in the veteran community that are doing tremendous things to assist veterans.

‘These individuals do not have the money, resources, connections or privilege that Prince Harry has.’

The ESPY Award is just the latest honour the Duke has accepted since he moved to California.

Among the others was the Robert F Kennedy Human Rights Ripple of Hope Award, presented to Harry and Meghan for the work they have undertaken in ‘promoting racial equality, social justice and mental health’.

Pat Tillman gave up his sporting career to serve in the military after the devastating terror attacks on September 11, 2001. He was killed by friendly fire in Afghanistan three years later

Pat Tillman gave up his sporting career to serve in the military after the devastating terror attacks on September 11, 2001. He was killed by friendly fire in Afghanistan three years later

A showbusiness source in the U.S. tells me: ‘These awards are great for keeping Harry and Meghan in the news. They boost their profile at a time when they are not producing much work.

‘Their agents love awards, too, as they keep everyone happy.’

For now. The backlash over the Pat Tillman award suggests that the American public might be starting to see this unending stream of awards and honours and something of a public relations strategy.

For frontline members of the Royal Family, honours are merely part of the role, whether it’s taking up a senior position with a military regiment or receiving a new decoration, such as the Family Order worn by Queen Camilla at last week’s state banquet for Japanese Emperor Naruhito.

Yet, today, Harry and Meghan are free of the constraints of monarchy – an institution which they appear to hold in contempt.

Why would they want or need regular new honours?

Indeed, if Harry had any honour, he would turn down the Pat Tillman Award and let the event’s organisers present it, instead, to someone who puts the values of self-sacrifice and service before personal gain.